« Back
Why Managed Futures?
Managed Futures in a Portfolio
As an investor, you recognize the need to evaluate managed futures in context; you want to know not only the stand-alone characteristics of managed futures, but also the impact that managed futures can have on your total portfolio. The following graphs explore key attributes of managed futures in smoothing overall portfolio performance.
Historical Correlation of Various Asset Classes to Managed Futures
January 2000 - December 2011
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Important Consideration: Non-correlation is over a long period (i.e., over 10 years). In addition, other asset classes have different investment objectives, costs and expenses, liquidity profiles, safety, guarantees/insurance, volatility, tax advantages/disadvantages. Investors are not able to invest directly in these indices. The performance of the indices does not represent the performance of The Frontier Fund.
Currency: The ICE Futures U.S. Dollar Index (USDX®). Source: CQG, Inc.
Equities: S&P 500® Total Return Index. Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
International Equities: The MSCI® EAFE® Index (Europe, Australasia, Far East). Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
Equity Long/Short: The Dow Jones Credit Suisse Long/Short Equity Hedge Fund IndexSM. Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
Cash: 3-Month T-Bill Rate. Source: federalreserve.gov.
REITs: The Dow Jones® Wilshire REIT Index. Index. Source: CQG, Inc.
Bonds: Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index®. Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
Commodities: TR/J CRB Excess Return Index® through June 2005. TR/J CRB Total Return Index® thereafter. Source: jefferies.com.
Hedge Funds: The Dow Jones Credit Suisse Hedge Fund IndexSM. Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
Managed Futures: CASAM CISDM Asset Weighted Index through October 2010. Barclay BTOP50 Index® thereafter. Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
Correlation is a numerical measure of the similarity (or difference) in the performance of two investments. As the graph to the left indicates, managed futures were the only major asset class with a negative correlation to equities (-0.25) during the 10-year period illustrated. This feature suggests that managed futures have a significantly different return pattern from that of equities.
Managed Futures Performance and Risk Measurements versus Other Alternative Asset Classes*
January 2000 - December 2011
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS.

Important Consideration: Non-correlation is over a long period (i.e., over 10 years). In addition, other asset classes have different investment objectives, costs and expenses, liquidity profiles, safety, guarantees/insurance, volatility, tax advantages/disadvantages. Investors are not able to invest directly in these indices. The performance of the indices does not represent the performance of The Frontier Fund.
Managed Futures: CASAM CISDM Asset Weighted Index through October 2010. Barclay BTOP50 Index® thereafter. Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
Hedge Funds: The Dow Jones Credit Suisse Hedge Fund IndexSM. Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
REITs: The Dow Jones® Wilshire REIT Index. Source: CQG, Inc.
Commodities: TR/J CRB Excess Return Index® through June 2005. TR/J CRB Total Return Index® thereafter. Source: jefferies.com.
Bonds: Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index®. Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
Equities: S&P 500® Total Return Index. Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
A drawdown is a period in which an investment moves from a peak to a subsequent low. With a relatively low maximum drawdown of 8%, managed futures have exhibited less down-side risk over the past decade than alternative asset classes with similar return profiles.* Standard deviation is a measurement of the volatility of an investment; the more volatile an investment, the higher its standard deviation. As the graph reveals, managed futures have relatively low standard deviation (8%) in comparison to other asset classes.
Integrating managed futures into a stock and bond portfolio can result in a higher return for a given level of risk, as illustrated by the efficient frontier.
An investor with a 50% allocation each to stocks and bonds experiences less performance and more volatility than an investor with allocations of 10% managed futures/45% stocks/45% bonds.
* Maximum drawdown is the measure of risk (also known as Worst Historical Loss) that illustrates the largest peak-to-valley decline, based on simulated monthly rates of return, during a given time period. The time period of analysis is from January 2000 through June 2011, unless otherwise noted. The maximum drawdown depicted here is not the maximum loss that can occur in an individual’s managed account. There is no guarantee that managed futures or the fund will meet its intended objective; accordingly, investors could lose a substantial portion, or even all, of their investment.
Efficient Frontier Theory of Portfolio Diversification: Hypothetical Return for a Given Level of Risk**
January 1980 – December 2011
PAST PERFORMANCE IS NOT NECESSARILY INDICATIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS

** This diagram models hypothetical portfolios of different compositions, based on actual index performance over the periods shown. Investors are not able to invest directly in these indices. The performance of the indices does not represent the performance of The Frontier Fund.
Managed Futures: CASAM CISDM Asset Weighted Index through October 2010. Barclay BTOP50 Index® thereafter. December 2010 performance is an estimate. Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
Equities: S&P 500® Total Return Index. Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
Bonds: Barclays Capital U.S. Aggregate Bond Index®. Source: PerTrac Financial Solutions.
« Back